Replacing Product Photography
In our last post on digital image realism, we discussed an inherent need for creating digital versions of physical products to trigger the online “A-ha” moment. For most marketers and companies, the answer has been traditional digital photography. In the past, CGI technology was not as advanced, the computer hardware not as powerful, and the skills required to match photography standards just not there. This left no alternative to expensive uni-dimensional photographs that have several underlying drawbacks. But before we go any further, let’s look at what those issues are.
What are some of the drawbacks of traditional forms of digital content creation?
One of the first questions that any photographer may ask is – “where is the product?” Unsurprisingly, it’s impossible to photograph products that are still in concept stage or have not yet come off the assembly line. While product photography may still be cheaper for a single unit, when looking to produce product images at scale, CGI is now a far cheaper option. As you can see in the comparison below, some of the disadvantages are a big red flag.
So, what is the alternative to photography?
The answer is the power of CGI tailored to the needs of today’s physical products, allowing for unparalleled flexibility, scalability, and time efficiency. Every color, labeling and regional variation of entire product ranges can now be digitized at a fraction of the cost of traditional product photography.
Using your existing CAD file or reference image set you get:
Some of the key benefits are:
We would love to hear some feedback from you, please follow us on Twitter @INDG. In the next blog in this series, we will discuss how M3M can streamline your content digitization strategy.